Cohen and kinds: a response to Nathan Nobis.
نویسنده
چکیده
In a recent article in the Journal of Applied Philosophy, Nathan Nobis outlines an argument against Carl Cohen’s influential defence of speciesism which, if successful, would be devastating [1]. This debate is of more than parochial interest, because the strategy Cohen employs to demarcate the class of beings with moral rights is widely utilized by opponents of abortion as well; it is not only our attitudes to non-human animals which are at stake, but also the morality of our treatment of the biologically human. I suspect that, as it stands at least, Nobis’s argument does not succeed: those who want to elevate the biologically human over the non-human have available plausible replies to his arguments. This is an exercise in devil’s advocacy: I am myself a supporter of fairly free access to abortions, and better treatment of non-human animals. However, just because I am committed to these views, I want to ensure that the arguments for them are the strongest they can possibly be. I offer this in that spirit, as a step toward strengthening these views by testing them against objections.
منابع مشابه
Review of Jonathan Kahn, Race in a Bottle: The Story of BiDil and Racialized Medicine in the Post-Genomic Age(1).
متن کامل
Carl Cohen's 'kind' arguments for animal rights and against human rights.
Carl Cohen's arguments against animal rights are shown to be unsound. His strategy entails that animals have rights, that humans do not, the negations of those conclusions, and other false and inconsistent implications. His main premise seems to imply that one can fail all tests and assignments in a class and yet easily pass if one's peers are passing and that one can become a convicted crimina...
متن کاملThe Benefit of Web- and Computer-Based Interventions for Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND Stress has been identified as one of the major public health issues in this century. New technologies offer opportunities to provide effective psychological interventions on a large scale. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of Web- and computer-based stress-management interventions in adults relative to a control group. METHODS A meta-analysis was perf...
متن کاملAbortion, metaphysics and morality: a review of Francis Beckwith's defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice.
In Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice (2007) and an earlier article in this journal, "Defending Abortion Philosophically"(2006), Francis Beckwith argues that fetuses are, from conception, prima facie wrong to kill. His arguments are based on what he calls a "metaphysics of the human person" known as "The Substance View." I argue that Beckwith's metaphysics does not s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of applied philosophy
دوره 21 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004